Monday, December 30, 2019

The Importance of Lof, Wyrd and Comitatus in Beowulf - Free Essay Example

Sample details Pages: 2 Words: 461 Downloads: 5 Date added: 2019/05/08 Category Literature Essay Level High school Tags: Beowulf Essay Did you like this example? The importance of lof (fame), wyrd (fate), and comitatus (companionship/loyalty) in Beowulf. To the Anglo saxons fame was just as important as life. There fate was there destiny to them. Companionship and loyalty was the Anglo Saxons always having eachothers back no matter what. I think the Anglo-saxons showed all these attributes throughout there life. Fame is the condition of being known or talked about by many people, especially on account of notable achievements. The battle was over, Beowulf had been granted new glory (340-341, 43). He gained a lot of fame for killing Grendal. Then that noble protector of all seamen Swam to land, rejoicing the heavy burdens he was bringing with him (579-580, 50). Not only did BeoWulf kill Grendal but his mother as well! His famous king bloody, gasping for breath(800-801, 58). Beowulf continued his legacy by fighting the dragon. Don’t waste time! Our writers will create an original "The Importance of Lof, Wyrd and Comitatus in Beowulf" essay for you Create order Fate is the development of events beyond a persons control, regarded as determined by a supernatural power. Fate has swept our race away, taken warriors in their strength and led them to the death that was waiting (825-827, 58). Beowulf talks about fate as he dies and what it has done to his people. Now Grendal and I are called together, and Ive come (159-160, 38). Herot talking about how fate brought him and Grendal together. But fate, that night, intended Grendal to gnaw the broken bones of his last human supper (257-259, 41). This quote talks about how it is Beowulfs fate to kill Grendal. Loyalty is the quality of being loyal to someone or something. As Grendal and Beowulf battled across them. Hrothgars wise men had fashioned Herot to stand forever (300-302, 42). This quote talks about the loyalty these men had to Beowulf. The Geats stayed, sat sadly, watching, imagining they saw there Lord but not believing they would ever see him again (559-561, 50). The Geats were not giving up on Beowulf showing upmost loyalty staying and waiting for him to arise victorious. Then wextons son went in, as quickly as he could, did as the dying Beowulf asked, entered the inner darkness of the tower, went with his mail shirt and his sword (764-767, 57). One of Beowulfs loyal soldiers jump into action to try and save Beowulf and kill the dragon. The importance of Fame, Fate, and Loyalty were very important to the Anglo-saxons. They are willing to do anything to get fame for their name. The Anglo-saxons believed in fate very much as they continued their battles if they were to die it was because of fate. Loyalty was one of the most important attribute to the Anglo-Saxons. they will jump into anything to save someone and have all of eachothers backs. That is why I think the Anglo-Saxons show all three of these qualities throughout there lives.

Sunday, December 22, 2019

Building Standards For The Base Configuration Of Internal...

Server Security Policy Purpose The purpose of this policy is to establish standards for the base configuration of internal server equipment that is owned and/or operated by IHS. Effective implementation of this policy will minimize unauthorized access to IHS proprietary information and technology. Scope This policy applies to server equipment owned and/or operated by IHS, and to servers registered under any IHS-owned internal network domain. This policy is specifically for equipment on the internal IHS network. For secure configuration of equipment external to IHS on the DMZ, refer to the DMZ Equipment Policy. Policy 1. Ownership and Responsibilities 1.1 All internal servers deployed at IHS will be owned by an operational group that is responsible for system administration. Approved server configuration guides must be established and maintained by each operational group, based on business needs and approved by IHS. Operational groups should monitor configuration compliance and implement an exception policy tailored to their environment. Each operational group must establish a process for changing the configuration guides, which includes review and approval by Engineering. 1.2 Servers must be registered within the enterprise infrastructure management system, iTop. At a minimum, the following information is required to positively identify the point of contact: 1.2.1 Server contact(s) and location, and a backup contact 1.2.2 Hardware and Operating System/Version 1.2.3Show MoreRelatedEssay on Soboat Technology Inc.: Information Sercurity Plan2328 Words   |  10 Pages Physical Security†¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦..6 Security Awareness Program†¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦...6 Password Protection†¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦.7 Environment†¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦.8 Equipment†¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦8 Misuse of Data†¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦.9 Loss of Data†¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦...10 Attackers†¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦10 Response Plan†¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦11 Incident HandlingRead MoreDesign and Implementation of Wifi Hotspot3604 Words   |  15 Pagesproject. He was who first brought us the idea of doing the Final Year Project on Wi-Fi Hotspot, Doing everything he could on his limited time to give us advice, tips and proposition on the project. We’d also liket to thank him for making most of the equipment vital for the project available to us. His assistance and understanding of my situation that enabled us to complete the project We’d also give a special word of thanks to Khorshedul Alam Shohag last year former student of Advanced diploma of telecommuniacationRead MoreWgu Capstone8760 Words   |  36 Pagesimplementation plan, roles and responsibilities, required equipment, new required policies, the new loan processing software training and time line for completion. †¢ The Proposed outcomes will include the new secure online loan processing program, which will provide secure storage of customers’ information, data security and access. New policies and procedures will be developed to restrict access to customer’s information. Purchased new computer equipment that will provide better security, new softwareRead MoreCcna Project Report10303 Words   |  42 PagesAddressing Introduction Private IP Masking Subnetting Example 7. LAN Solution Requirement Solution Specification Sheet 8. Router Internal Components Network Interfaces Configuring Configuring using Console Routing Protocols RIP IGRP Access List 9. Firewall Introduction Technologies Configuring 10. WLAN Standards Topologies Infrastructure Network Adhoc Network 11. Intrusion Detection System (IDS) HIDS NIDS Techniques 12. Integrated Services DigitalRead MoreData Centers Are Virtual Or Physical Infrastructure Used By Organizations3587 Words   |  15 Pages Data centers are virtual or physical infrastructure used by organizations to host server, computer and networking systems and components for the company s information technology (IT) needs, which typically include storage, processing and serving large amounts of critical data to clients in a client/server architecture. A data center, often requires redundant or backup power supply systems, redundant networking connections, cooling systems and policy-based security systems for running the organizationRead MoreCmit 495 Implementation Plan Essay13676 Words   |  55 PagesWorld-Wide Trading Company: Project Implementation Plan Group 3 Kristine Bird (AD Forest Domain OU, Groups and GPO Implementation) Ryan Bonisch (Contact list and LAN Implementation Tasks) Anthony Campo (Configuration of Routers, Switches, and VLANs) Gerald Casanada (Voice VLAN, Wireless, DHCP and DNS) Jennifer Coleman (AD Implementation and Tasks lists for AD Policies) Billie Jo Derouin (Security Implementation) Raymond Mack (Security Technology and Timeline) University of MarylandRead MoreComputer Communication4004 Words   |  17 PagesDedicated servers specialize in performing specific tasks. Depending on the specific task, they may be called an application server, communication server, database server, file server, printer server or Web server. †¢ Server – a node that shares resources with other nodes. Dedicated servers specialize in performing specific tasks. Depending on the specific task, they may be called an application server, communication server, database server, file server, printer server or web server. †¢ Hub-Read MoreOrange Creek Inc Essay12565 Words   |  51 PagesStrategy PAGEREF _Toc334622212 \h 222.1System Information PAGEREF _Toc334622213 \h 222.2Backup and Offsite Storage Procedures PAGEREF _Toc334622214 \h 222.3Offsite Storage Services PAGEREF _Toc334622215 \h 222.4Alternate Site Hardware and Software Configurations PAGEREF _Toc334622216 \h 232.5Disaster Response PAGEREF _Toc334622217 \h 232.6functional teams and responsibilities PAGEREF _Toc334622218 \h 242.7Resuming Normal Operations PAGEREF _Toc334622219 \h 282.8Information Security PAGEREF _Toc334622220Read MoreIt Network Technical Proposal6645 Words   |  27 Pages 2.1.1 Design 2.1.2 EMI 2.1.3 Respect of standard 2.1.4 Documentation 2.1.5 Testing and Testing Equipment 2.1.6 Warranty 2.2 Deliverable 2.2.1 Structured Cabling 2.2.2 LAN Active Equipment 2.2.3 Server Application and Implementation services 2.2.4 Installation Read MoreCompany Policy3849 Words   |  16 Pagesa local multimedia chain with four locations. Each store has been acting independently of one another and has difficulty-coordinating customer sales from one store to another based on inventory. Because of poor communications, revenue and customer base have been lost due to jumbled inventory from store to store, decentralized accounting, and no Internet-based commerce. With the successful implementation of a WAN solution, all stores will have the ability to access a centralized database for inventory

Saturday, December 14, 2019

Did Microsoft Violate Antitrust Policy Free Essays

â€Å"The US complaint has been filed by a Tangent, a small Burlingame, California-based hardware vendor that says it is a Microsoft certified partner, but has still been â€Å"caused significant harm† by â€Å"Microsoft’s exclusionary and restrictive practices†[1] The Northern California Company Tangent, who is also a Microsoft Certified Partner, has claimed that Microsoft has caused them â€Å"significant harm† through â€Å"exclusionary and restrictive† practices.[2] In its complaint, Tangent describes patterns of anticompetitive practices by Microsoft.     The activities listed by Tangent incorporate the procedure of no-option bundling of Outlook (electronic mail software) with Office (a suite of word processing, financial, media and various business software) and Active Directory (Lightweight Directory Access Protocol which provide central authentication and authorization services for Windows based computers) with Windows Server (host integration). We will write a custom essay sample on Did Microsoft Violate Antitrust Policy? or any similar topic only for you Order Now The forced process under the bundling system also includes the Windows Media Player (a software application player and library for digital media) and Windows Media Server (advanced live video and audio streaming functionality) along with the desktop personal computer and the server operating system, e.g. XP, Vista, etc. Tangent attorneys’ stated in the law suit, â€Å"Microsoft’s exclusionary and restrictive practices†¦have caused significant harm to (Tangent) by increasing, maintaining or stabilizing the price it paid for Microsoft’s operating system software above competitive levels,† [3] In a filing with the US District Court for the Northern District of California, Tangent’s resident territory and the right of the plaintiff to file locally, is in the clear supportive position to show cause of how Microsoft has historically continued to engage in anticompetitive conduct and practices. Thereby causing irreparable financial and market damages by directly manipulating by different means in a number of forms the price Tangent has paid for Microsoft’s operating system software.   Clearly upon comparison and review the prices are openly above competitive degrees. Tangent has been able to list in the detail the historical relation of the personal computer and the Microsoft factor.   They contend that Microsoft, in the letter of the law as well as the spirit, has still failed to operate within number of instruction guidelines and continues to violate Section 2 of the Sherman Act, 15 U.S.C.,  §2. Tangent has taken on the interesting position of requesting a jury to hear the case instead of a judge.   Clearly, the intent is to appeal to peers or citizens who will hear testimony as to the unfair practices of Microsoft.   There is the grave risk on the part of the Tangent argument that the issues are very complicated and so technically that only engineers or legally trained experts can decided on the case.   It can be equally promised that Microsoft lawyers will attempt to convolute the issue to a level of complicate techno speak in order to confuse the jury and possible deadlock or mistrial.   Either way, the path for appeal is being paved. Without the normal constraint of frank competition in the marketplace and also because of â€Å"exclusionary practices† invoked by Microsoft as a standard practice, Microsoft has been able to perform in a way that the increases the â€Å"playing field† edge in its favor. Additionally, this method employed by Microsoft works to preserve or artificially maintain prices at anti-competitive conditions that cause harm to vendors and business partners. [4] In essence, Tangent has charged that Microsoft has artificially inflated prices for the cost of the operating system software for certified partners who have no other choice in the matter thus injuring Tangent. One of the strongest positions taken by Tangent against Microsoft is that the Microsoft server OS (operation system) includes specific, unique, undocumented programs and screens (interfaces) accessed and employed by its servers to communicate seamlessly and tacitly with one another.   Primarily, the use of several servers (server farm) is within a multiple network server community. â€Å"Tangent alleged further that Microsoft entered into restrictive agreements with OEMs (Original Equipment Manufacturer) and system builders, limiting or eliminating their ability to feature non-Microsoft products.† [5] Cleary, the most important aspect of the Tangents argument, which in this case can be asserted by any plaintiff, is for Microsoft to cease marketing products under the guise that the uniformity of it’s software is standardize and practical.   This is not the case nor has it been in quite a while.   The position by Microsoft does not give rise to a supportive community of certified partners.   Candidly, it causes a minor panic. Microsoft’s secretive and clandestine modus operand lends it self to a sense of obvious guilt.   The resistance to the release of the source code for any of it’s of its operating systems underlies its non-competitive practices. Demonstrating no lack of indignation, Microsoft has chosen not to respond to any comments on this complaint or that fact any other.   Their practice has been to only to acknowledge that the case is being reviewed. Tangent is based in the San Francisco Bay Area city of Burlingame and builds custom configured-to-order desktops, notebooks, thin clients and servers primarily for educational institutions, government agencies, business markets and proprietary enterprises.   The company is using the Microsoft Operating Systems. [1]   -Microsoft faces fresh US and EU antitrust complaints 23rd February 2006 [2] http://wowtechminute.com/93/antitrust-lawsuit-antithesis/ Antitrust Lawsuit Antithesis Posted by Brent Norris Technology News March 2006 [3] http://news.com.com/Computer+maker+files+antitrust+suit+against+Microsoft/2100-1014_3-6041788.html By Ina Fried Staff Writer, CNET News.com Published: February 21, 2006, [4] http://www.theinquirer.net/default.aspx?article=29797 Off at a tangent By INQUIRER staff: Monday 20 February 2006, 10:10 [5] http://www.channelinsider.com/article/Tangent+Suit+Claims+Microsoft+Soaked+Partners/171923_1.aspx   Tangent Suit Claims Microsoft Soaked Partners DATE: 21-FEB-2006 By John Hazard How to cite Did Microsoft Violate Antitrust Policy?, Essay examples

Friday, December 6, 2019

Shared Mental Mode Communication Collective -Myassignmenthelp.Com

Question: Discuss About The Shared Mental Mode Communication Collective? Answer: Introduction: Reflective learning is the procedure that allows the students with opportunities to step back from their learning experience and develop critical thinking skills. It helps in improvement of future performance by analyzing and evaluating the different experiences and reflecting on meaningful observations (Sherstyuk, Olekh and Kolesnikova, 2016). Researchers are of the opinion that reflective learning helps in moving the students form the surface learning to that of in-depth learning genre that include different types of activities like self-review, peer-review and also personal development planning (Woodcock, 2017). This assignment would be a reflective journal that would depict my experiences and the issues I faced in the two domains that are taught in class. I will reflect on the different insights and views I have developed from the experiences and how I want to develop those skills in the future. Team-forming and team-performance: I had been assigned as the team leader during my placement months where I had to form a team of the fresher employees and had to complete a set of goals that had been set by the higher authorities. I was quite excited to get this opportunity and immediately formed a team of 10 employees out of 20 employees who got the placements. I assigned them their respective tasks and set them deadlines. I expected them to complete their work within the deadlines but on the day of submission of their work, I realized that none of the members were ready with their work and they were constantly blaming on each other for their inability to complete. Moreover, I also noticed that the work done by them did not synchronize with each other and therefore it was a complete massacre. I noticed that the team members did not communicate with each other and kept a safe distance. Moreover, feedbacks were not given properly and negative feedbacks from each other destroyed the morale of the other team members. M oreover, cultural stereotypes were also found between the Australians and the Asian members that affected the dignity and respect of the members. All these were creating job stress in them and even two of the members approached the authority for leaving the team. Report writing: Another incident also occurred after this. I was asked by the higher authority to submit a report on the progress of the team and how the team members are performing. I became quite nervous as I had to collect and incorporate a large amount of data about each of my ten team members. I clearly wrote about their performances, their inhibitions, their issues and challenges and described how they were progressing in their respective tasks. I even attached their productivity report in an excel file. However, the authority criticized my report and stated that the information provided by me in my report was not done professionally and that I need to learn proper ways of report writing. I was severely embarrassed after this incident. However, I did not allow myself to lose my confidence and in turn requested my mentor to help in rectifying the mistakes. He explained to me in details about the mistakes I made. Insights I developed after the incidents: After reflecting on the incidences, I realized a number of mistakes I had made while developing and managing a team. I had been quite fast into initiating the work but did not focus into the five steps that are important in team formation. The first stage is called the forming stage that I totally ignored. At this stage, I should have given scope to the team members to know each other and understand the different roles that they need to perform with the teams. This stage needs focusing on arranging a meeting where they would be able to introduce each other and mention their job roles so that others can understand each others participation (Zoogah, Nole and Shenkar, 2015) . As I did not conduct the step, both of their task-related queries and interpersonal roles were unclear to them. I also did not provide importance to the storming stage. I should have actively monitored them during work or should have conducted meeting where the team members would have got the scope to clarify their issues and solve their misunderstandings. Constructive feedback should have been asked from the team member about each other so that the members could have developed the skills (Fiore and Georganta, 2017). As the steps were not conducted properly, different problems like cultural conflicts, blame games and job dissatisfaction others took place within the team. The norming stage was also not conducted successfully. Due to so many issues within the team like cultural conflicts, lack of role clarity and improper communication among the team members, informal relationship did not take place among the members and therefore no strong bonds and relationship development took place. Because of this, there was no synchronization among the work of the team members (Brock, et al., 2017). Therefore, blame games became common. The failure of the above stages indeed resulted in the failure of the fourth stage called the performing stage and the fifth stage called the adjourning stage. None of the members could actively perform their respective roles and failed miserably. Incident of report writing: In the second situation, my mentor pointed out that I had made a number of mistakes while writing the report. The main problem was that I had not followed the format of the report properly. I had written it in the form of essay with long paragraphs that disappointed the higher officials. I should have incorporated small paragraphs with distinct information in each of them so that all the important details get highlighted to the professionals (Ee and Eng, 2015). Moreover, I conducted another big mistake where I failed to provide heading to the paragraphs which made the higher officials think that I have missed out many points. Moreover, my writing was quite scattered. This is said so because unlike the guidelines or a proper report, I did not provide the conclusion and recommendation at the end but rather incorporated it throughout the report. This was a turn off for the officers, as they could not understand the issues I depicted in the report. There was a complete missing of flow in my report. Steps that I will take for the future: From the entire reflection on the incidents, I have developed a proper understanding of how to develop and manage different attributes of forming and managing a team. I will make sure that I maintain each of the steps of team-forming effectively like forming, storming, norming, performing and adjourning. I also have to ensure that new team members develop the important skills that are important in team working like proper communication skills. Active listening and constructive feedback giving and listening skills should be inculcated as important teamwork skills (Almost, et al., 2015). This would help in developing rapport among the team members for which effective bonding and relationship building will take place. The better their relationships are both formally and informally, the better their coordination and collaboration are at workplace (Turner, 2014). High level of collaboration will ensure that the work is completed within deadline and high quality of work is produced. Such t eamwork will help in ensuring that the members do not develop job stress and job dissatisfaction (Donia, ONeill and Brutus, 2018). Therefore, I will first form teams following the five important steps. Then I will ensure that following the Belbins theory, I also have to assign proper roles that match with their job preferences. Maintaining the role clarity will help in reducing stress and increase productivity. I will conduct important discussion sessions, where all members would disclose their concerns and issues so that they can be solved properly. Moreover, in the meetings, I should also initiate a trend of constructive feedback sharing so that miscommunications are resolved and innovations and creativity are ensured. Report writing skills: In order to ensure that I develop proper report writing skills, I first need to make a planning and develop a rough with all the important points that I will cover (Garza, 2016). This will help me to understand the important heading that I have to make for each point. Following this, I will incorporate the headings first and then initiate data incorporation within it. Moreover, I will be very careful about not making the paragraphs too long as this is against the guidelines of writing reports. I will make separate sections for the conclusion and recommendations and refrain from incorporating any conclusive ideas in the body of the report (Ohaja, 2017). Moreover, I will also be making proper sections and subsection of the different points separately with proper headings and subheadings. This will ensure more clarity in the report and the higher officials will be pleased (Morley-Warner 2009) Conclusion: From the entire discussion, I understood that I do not have proper skills in forming and managing teams. The reflection of the episodes helped me in identifying the different mistakes I made as a team leader. Following the mistakes, I developed a planning of inculcating proper teamwork attributes and skills among the team members. Proper ways of forming the teams, assigning them of their roles, managing the issues faced by team members and others are important parts of ensuring a highly productive teamwork. Moreover, the reflection of the incidents also showed me that I do not have proper report writing ideas which I need to develop through proper practice and being careful while writing report in future. This attribute would ensure that I emerge as effective and successful professional in future. References: Almost, J., Wolff, A., Mildon, B., Price, S., Godfrey, C., Robinson, S., Ross-White, A. and Mercado-Mallari, S., 2015. Positive and negative behaviours in workplace relationships: a scoping review protocol.BMJ open,5(2), p.e007685. Brock, S.E., McAliney, P.J., Ma, C.H. and Sen, A., 2017. Toward more practical measurement of teamwork skills.Journal of Workplace Learning,29(2), pp.124-133. Donia, M.B., O'Neill, T.A. and Brutus, S., 2018. The longitudinal effects of peer feedback in the development and transfer of student teamwork skills.Learning and Individual Differences,61, pp.87-98. Ee, C.S. and Eng, T.K., 2015. Technical Report Writing in Higher Education: A Theoretical Analysis of Writing Practices.Journal of Interdisciplinary Research in Education Volume,5(1). Emedia.rmit.edu.au. 2018.For Research and Education in the Arts, Sydney| Learning Lab. [online] Available at: https://emedia.rmit.edu.au/learninglab/welcome [Accessed 11 Feb. 2018]. Fiore, S.M. and Georganta, E., 2017. Collaborative Problem-Solving and Team Development: Extending the Macrocognition in Teams Model through Considerations of the Team Life Cycle. InTeam Dynamics Over Time(pp. 189-208). Emerald Publishing Limited. Garza, S., 2016. Book Review: Psychoeducational assessment and report writing. Goetsch, D.L. and Davis, S.B., 2014.Quality management for organizational excellence. Upper Saddle River, NJ: pearson. Morley-Warner, T., 2009.Academic Writing is--: A Guide to Writing in a University Context. Association for Academic Language and Learning. ISBN:978098429725 Ohaja, E.U., 2017. Skills for Effective Speech and Report Writing.International Journal of Communication,2(1). Sherstyuk, O., Olekh, ?. and Kolesnikova, K., 2016. The research on role differentiation as a method of forming the project team.- , (2 (3)), pp.63-68. Turner, M.E., 2014.Groups at work: Theory and research. Psychology Press. Woodcock, M., 2017.Team development manual. Routledge. Zoogah, D.B., Noe, R.A. and Shenkar, O., 2015. Shared mental model, team communication and collective self-efficacy: an investigation of strategic alliance team effectiveness.International Journal of Strategic Business Alliances,4(4), pp.244-270.